Florida Memory is administered by the Florida Department of State, Division of Library and Information Services, Bureau of Archives and Records Management. The digitized records on Florida Memory come from the collections of the State Archives of Florida and the special collections of the State Library of Florida.
State Archives of Florida
- ArchivesFlorida.com
- State Archives Online Catalog
- ArchivesFlorida.com
- ArchivesFlorida.com
State Library of Florida
Related Sites
Description of previous item
Description of next item
Lower Court
Date
Box
Folder
Transcript
John E. Seaman et. Al (appellants libellants)
v.
Schooner Forester and Cargo (appellee and Respondent)
Appeal from Franklin Superior Court
To the honorable court of Appeals- The Petition of John E. seaman by his Proctors Semmes and Davis Showeth:
That at the last session of the court below from which this appeal is taken- and order if appraisement was made by the said court and appraises appraiser appointed to appraise the said Schooner and Cargo- who proceeded to do so and made their report according to the law, which is part of the record filed in this court, and now the petitioner states it to this honorable court that owning to the want of knowledge on that part of the appraiser of the merchandise forming the said cargo which they now appointed to appraisal - (they being by profession seaman and the cargo compound of any goods) the said appraiser in their estimate fell fort short of the real value of the said cargo.
And the petition states further of his number on the said cargo is with a much larger sum that it was estimated at by the said appraiser.
And therefore [?] petitioner
Title
Subject
Description
In 1839, the Franklin Circuit Court of the Superior Court for Middle Florida, located at Apalachicola, considered the case John E. Seaman, et al. v. Schooner Forester.
This case highlighted the many perils faced by oceangoing vessels as they plied Florida's waters. In September 1838, the schooner Forester, bound for New Orleans via Apalachicola and Mobile, ran aground off the west end of St. George Island. The schooner Orleans, at the port of Apalachicola for repairs, responded and began saving the crew, passengers, and cargo of the Forester.
During the operations, the Orleans suffered additional damages as it struck the shallow seafloor and bounced off the stranded Forester. These injuries further weakened the Orleans, necessitating continuous pumping by the ship's crew to prevent it too from sinking beneath the waves. Over the course of several days, the crew of the Orleans succeeded in lightening the Forester and freeing it from the reef. Because of high seas, the salvagers quickly turned to loading smaller vessels rather than further risk the Orleans. Finally, once all the cargo was offloaded, the battered vessels returned to the nearby port of Apalachicola to assess the damage.
The crew of the Orleans, led by its Master and part-owner John E. Seaman, sought compensation for their heroic efforts to prevent the loss of life and cargo from the Forester. Because the Orleans was not regularly employed in wrecking, it appears that the intervention of the court was necessary to secure payment for services rendered. Also, apparently the insurance policy on the Orleans covered the vessel only in the waters of Apalachicola Bay and did not extend to the reefs offshore St. George Island. Seaman and his crew argued before the court that they had little choice but to act quickly to save the Forester as no other capable vessel was in port at the time.
Citing the customary practice of compensating wreckers and salvagers, the crew of the Orleans sought wages to the tune of $2 per day as well as funds to assist in repairing their vessel. Seaman for his part demanded $5 per day. According to documents included with the case, six men from the Orleans had aided the distressed Forester.
In order to determine the payment due to Seaman and the crew of the Orleans, appraisers had to assess the value of the Forester and its cargo. The initial appraisals met resistance from both parties. Their objections rested on the belief that the appraisers were not well enough acquainted with the business of shipping to properly assess the value of the Forester and its cargo. Another problem arose from the fact that some cargo, specifically about 150 sacks of salt, were thrown overboard to lighten the ship. Representatives on both sides grew impatient with the pace of the proceedings, as with every day the perishable cargo risked becoming worthless.
The court ordered the sale of goods salvaged from the Forester at a public auction. The crew of the Orleans was to be paid one-third of the amount collected as well as one-fourth of the court costs they incurred. It appears that at this point in the trial representatives for the Forester filed an appeal, the results of which are unknown.
As with other cases involving wrecking and salvaging, this case documents the complexities of maritime law and the dangers faced by shipping interests in the Gulf of Mexico. What is different about the Forester case is that its rescuers were pressed into service, rather than being regular wreckers. Their valiant efforts to save the crew, passengers, and cargo may have netted them an eventual reward, but at the expense of their own ship and a considerable amount of their time.
Creator
Source
Date
Format
Language
Type
Identifier
Coverage
Folder
Box
Lower Court
Total Images
Image Path
Image Path - Large
Transcript Path
Thumbnail
Chicago Manual of Style
Florida Supreme Court. John E. Seamen et. al v. Schooner Forester and Cargo. 1839. State Archives of Florida, Florida Memory. <https://www.floridamemory.com/items/show/260686>, accessed 30 November 2024.
MLA
Florida Supreme Court. John E. Seamen et. al v. Schooner Forester and Cargo. 1839. State Archives of Florida, Florida Memory. Accessed 30 Nov. 2024.<https://www.floridamemory.com/items/show/260686>
AP Style Photo Citation
(State Archives of Florida/Florida Supreme Court)