"As To Yellow Fever"
Author: Author: Wall, John P. (John Perry), b. 1867
Date: n.d.
Series: S 915
(Page 6 of 6)
Transcript
Page 7/Column 1
doubtless the confederates of the smugglers
and receivers of the goods. This was evi-
dently the avenue by which the fever was
introduced in the character of fomites, as I
expect to be able to conclusively prove at
the proper time. The sanitary condition of
the city afforded a suitable soil for the lodge-
ment and propagation of the infectious
poison, and the result the world knows. It
is true that the city authorities disregarded
my warnings as to the neglected sanitary
condition of the city, and seemed to be in-
spired with a spirit of antagonism to me per-
sonally. Why this was so I leave to them to
explain if they can; and if the result has
been pleasing to them and the people of
Tampa, they are welcome to all the enjoy-
ment it affords.
I was absent from Tampa from the 2d to
the 25 th of September, and, from what has
since come to my knowledge. I presume
the first cases must have made their appear-
ance about the middle of September – in res-
idents and not in persons who had come
from either Key West or Havana. How-
ever, I was home but a few days before my
suspicions were aroused as to the presence of
yellow fever in the city, but these were not
confirmed till the first of the following
week, October 3d and 4 th. On the 22 nd of
September a case was reported, but the
physicians who saw it denied its being yel-
low fever. This was three days before my
return. I know now that if I had seen cer-
tain cases to which my attention was called
on the day I announced its presence to
the public, I should have been able to de-
clare its presence at least six days earlier
than I did.
However, the diagnosis of yellow fever is
not the easy thing that some suppose, nor
does a post mortem always demonstrate
the true character of the disease, as some doc-
tors believe. In 1870 the disease prevailed
on Governor’s Island a month before it was
recognized even by the Health Board of
New York who stated that “post mortem
examinations upon the bodies gave satisfac-
tory evidence that the disease was not yellow
fever.” But it was proved to be yellow fever
when seen by a medical man familiar with the
disease. There were 159 cases with 52 deaths.
But yet a whole month passed before the
true character of the disease was recognized
on an island in New York Harbor within
rifle shot of Castle Garden. Strange to say
there were a few cases in the city, but the
epidemic on the island did not extend to the
city. (N.Y. Medical Record for 1870 and
1871.) “The late Dr. Warren Stone, of New
Orleans, very justly remarked that when he
had seen one epidemic of yellow fever he
thought he knew all about it, but after see-
ing twenty epidemics he discovered that he
knew nothing about it.” Such was the lan-
guage of the late Dr. J.C. Nott, who gave it
as an illustration of how little really was
known of the disease by those who had had a
life-time opportunity, as it were, to study it.
The mortality here has been about 17 per
cent , among the whites, and hardly one per
cent, amount the blacks. There have been
up to date, 26 th of November, 72 deaths from
the fever, only 2 o which were colored –
one mulatto and one full blooded African.
Page 7/Column 2
The exact number of cases in Tampa and
vicinity is not known, as all were not re-
ported, and some were so mild as not to re-
quire the services of a physician; but I
should estimate the number at about 400
whites and possibly 200 negroes. Among
the latter the cases were, as a rule, of mild
type. Not an old resident who had had the
fever in previous epidemic in Tampa, had
it this time; nor did any one suffer from a
second attack during the epidemic. The
whole adult Cuban population was acclimate-
ed and escaped. Nor does this immunity
conferred by one attack of the disease, de-
pend on the severity of the attack – a mild
attack being as protective as a severe one.
With children it is generally mild – the
younger the child the milder the fever – so
that is a great mistake to remove small
children beyond the infection if it is expect-
ed the place where it is epidemic or any oth-
er Southern city, is to be their homes, i.e.,
provided the parents are acclimated so as to
run no risk themselves.
There is another prevalent idea, enter-
tained, too, by some very competent men,
the erroneousness of which I desire to point
out; and that is in case of an epidemic appear-
ing in a city, all that is necessary is to re-
move the unacclimated into camps some dis-
tance in the country. This is impracticable
in the first place, because of the lack of con-
veniences in the shape of houses or even
tents for the protection of the people from
the inclemencies of the weather, and in the
second place, even if such camp was estab-
lished, communication with the infected
place for some time at least, would from the
very nature of things, be kept up, so that
the infection would be sure to invade the
camp before arrangements for getting sup-
plies and other necessaries from uninfected
places could be made. In this way the fever
was carried out into families several miles
from here into the country during the pres-
ent epidemic. According to Dr. J. C. Nott,
who moved his family from Mobile into the
piney woods seven miles from the city, in
1856, even before the fever reached Mobile
from New Orleans, the fever followed his
family out of the city and he lost four of his
children. (N. Y. Medical Record, 1871.)
But there are other things which render
this camp business wholly impractical:
1 st, getting the people to leave their homes
when there are so many medical ignora-
muses and wiseacres who will sear to the
last that it is not yellow fever; and 2d, the
impossibility of keeping hem there if they
should feel disposed to have communication
with the infected area. It is very easy for
theorists and inexperienced people to say
what ought or should be done, but carry-
ing out their suggestions is altogether a very
different thing, unless one was an autocrat
with a standing army toe execute his orders.
It is one thing to preach, and another to
practice. And it is for this reason that a
State Board of Health would be as literally
helpless in controlling the spread of an epi-
demic as any other authority now existing.
The success of the National Board in 1879
was not encouraging and proved a failure.
John P. Wall, M.D.
November 28th.